“Critical disability studies start with disability but never end with it: disability is the space from which to think through a host of political, theoretical and practical issues that are relevant to all.”
Dan Goodley, 632. Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies
Critical Disability Studies (CDS) is a form of understanding disability that prioritises the recognition of disability as an aspect of society and seeks to both promote awareness of the experiences of people with disability and to create a better understanding of disability to allow for social change. CDS works to critique the normative practises, beliefs and assumptions of disability and is critical of the medical discourses that have influenced the medicalised model of disability and contributed to the marginalisation of people with disabilities.
It places the importance of the discussion in the space where the ideas of physical impairment and the social construct of disability interact; which is the body of the individual who has been marginalised or disadvantaged by the perception or physicality of disability. The intention here is to reclaim the social identities of people with the lived experience of disability, also attempting to establish a connection between disability studies and practical life experiences. CDS values the voice of the individual, and encourages those who do live with disability to speak up and speak for themselves. Therefore, in CDS the lived experience of the people with disability over the knowledge of those who are perceived as experts but who only understand the issues from an academic standpoint.
In addition, CDS fights against the notion of othering that puts people with disability into a space where they are no longer viewed as a sentient, intelligent being. Rather, they are framed as a person who is defined entirely by the ways in which their experiences, those of impairment and disability, make them different from the social perception of the able-bodied individual. This is a harmful attitude that places the perceived 'normal' vs the 'other' who is abnormal and therefore cannot be approached with the same level of understanding.
CDS has been criticised for being too focused on the theory and too unconcerned with practical application. Implementing practical action is made difficult by the fact that many social practises and education policies are already built on the medical model of disability, but it is possible to build policies upon CDS. The current social realities of people with disability, even though there is more of a discussion surrounding the issues, are still tied in with marginalisation and discrimination.